On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 10:37:46AM -0400, Brian Foster wrote: > There are probably a couple different ways to handle this. We could log > the inode in the bmap cases in order to preserve the pincount check. I'd favor that. For one performance should be better, second we really need to dirty the inode anyway for v5 file systems as that's the mechanism used to increment di_changecount. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
