Hi Al,
Today's linux-next merge of the vfs tree got a conflict in
fs/xfs/xfs_iops.c between commit e8e9ad42c1f1 ("xfs: take i_mmap_lock
on extent manipulation operations") from the xfs tree and commit
5dd3dc06371a ("VFS: normal filesystems (and lustre): d_inode()
annotations") from the vfs tree.
I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary (no action
is required).
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
diff --cc fs/xfs/xfs_iops.c
index 015d6a366b16,54b95232d946..000000000000
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_iops.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_iops.c
@@@ -953,13 -975,9 +953,13 @@@ xfs_vn_setattr
uint iolock = XFS_IOLOCK_EXCL;
xfs_ilock(ip, iolock);
- error = xfs_break_layouts(dentry->d_inode, &iolock);
+ error = xfs_break_layouts(d_inode(dentry), &iolock);
- if (!error)
+ if (!error) {
+ xfs_ilock(ip, XFS_MMAPLOCK_EXCL);
+ iolock |= XFS_MMAPLOCK_EXCL;
+
error = xfs_setattr_size(ip, iattr);
+ }
xfs_iunlock(ip, iolock);
} else {
error = xfs_setattr_nonsize(ip, iattr, 0);
Attachment:
pgpLSXQWslkl7.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
