On 03/26/2015 12:11 PM, J. Bruce Fields wrote: > On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 11:47:03AM -0400, Anna Schumaker wrote: >> On 03/26/2015 11:38 AM, J. Bruce Fields wrote: >>> On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 11:32:25AM -0400, Trond Myklebust wrote: >>>> On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 11:21 AM, Anna Schumaker >>>> <Anna.Schumaker@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>>> Here are my updated numbers! I tested with files 5G in size: one 100% data, one 100% hole, and one alternating between hole and data every 4K. I collected data for both v4.1 and v4.2 with and without the READ_PLUS patches: >>>>> >>>>> ########################## >>>>> # # >>>>> # Without READ_PLUS # >>>>> # # >>>>> ########################## >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> NFS v4.1: >>>>> Trial >>>>> |---------|---------|---------|---------|---------|---------|---------| >>>>> | | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | Average | >>>>> |---------|---------|---------|---------|---------|---------|---------| >>>>> | Data | 8.723s | 7.243s | 8.252s | 6.997s | 6.980s | 7.639s | >>>>> | Hole | 5.271s | 5.224s | 5.060s | 4.897s | 5.321s | 5.155s | >>>>> | Mixed | 8.050s | 10.057s | 7.919s | 8.060s | 9.557s | 8.729s | >>>>> |---------|---------|---------|---------|---------|---------|---------| >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> NFS v4.2: >>>>> Trial >>>>> |---------|---------|---------|---------|---------|---------|---------| >>>>> | | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | Average | >>>>> |---------|---------|---------|---------|---------|---------|---------| >>>>> | Data | 6.707s | 7.070s | 6.722s | 6.761s | 6.810s | 6.814s | >>>>> | Hole | 5.152s | 5.149s | 5.213s | 5.206s | 5.312s | 5.206s | >>>>> | Mixed | 7.979s | 7.985s | 8.177s | 7.772s | 8.280s | 8.039s | >>>>> |---------|---------|---------|---------|---------|---------|---------| >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> ####################### >>>>> # # >>>>> # With READ_PLUS # >>>>> # # >>>>> ####################### >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> NFS v4.1: >>>>> Trial >>>>> |---------|---------|---------|---------|---------|---------|---------| >>>>> | | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | Average | >>>>> |---------|---------|---------|---------|---------|---------|---------| >>>>> | Data | 9.082s | 7.008s | 7.116s | 6.771s | 7.902s | 7.576s | >>>>> | Hole | 5.333s | 5.358s | 5.380s | 5.161s | 5.282s | 5.303s | >>>>> | Mixed | 8.189s | 8.308s | 9.540s | 7.937s | 8.420s | 8.479s | >>>>> |---------|---------|---------|---------|---------|---------|---------| >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> NFS v4.2: >>>>> Trial >>>>> |---------|---------|---------|---------|---------|---------|---------| >>>>> | | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | Average | >>>>> |---------|---------|---------|---------|---------|---------|---------| >>>>> | Data | 7.033s | 6.829s | 7.025s | 6.873s | 7.134s | 6.979s | >>>>> | Hole | 1.794s | 1.800s | 1.905s | 1.811s | 1.725s | 1.807s | >>>>> | Mixed | 7.590s | 8.777s | 9.423s | 10.366s | 8.024s | 8.836s | >>>>> |---------|---------|---------|---------|---------|---------|---------| >>>>> >>>> >>>> So there is a clear win in the 100% hole case here, but otherwise the >>>> statistical fluctuations are dominating the numbers. Can you get us a >>>> little more stats and then perhaps run the results through nfsometer? >>> >>> Also, could you describe the setup (are these still kvm's), and how >>> you're clearing the cache between runs? >> >> These are still KVMs and my server is exporting an xfs filesystem. I clear caches by running "echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches" on the server before every read, and I remount my client after reading each set of three files once. > > What sort of device is the exported xfs filesystem on? (Can't there > be a second level of caching on the guest, depending on how it's set > up?) My host is a macbook pro running Archlinux, and I have all my virtio disks set to "cache mode = none". Let me know if you were asking something different! > > Can we get results on bare metal? (The kvm test might be a good > worst-case for read_plus, as I'd expect bandwidth to be relatively high > compared to the cost of the extra memcpy's or seek calls. But it also > seems more complicated.) I do all of my testing on kvm these days! I'll see how difficult it is to setup refind with a custom kernel to test between my laptop and my desktop (or I could run the test between my raspberry pis!) Anna > > --b. > _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
