Re: [PATCH 12/13 V2] xfs_repair: don't clear . or .. in process_dir2_data

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 03:17:58PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> process_dir2_data() has special . and .. processing; it is able
> to correct these inodes, so there is no reason to clear them.
> 
> Do this before we adjust a length 0 filename to length 1, so
> that we don't take this action on an accidentally created "."
> name from a hidden dotfile.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---

Reviewed-by: Brian Foster <bfoster@xxxxxxxxxx>

> 
> V2: Move the new hunk up, before we possibly reset the namelen to 1; 
> a 0-length ".hidden" file could turn in a length-1 "." and not get
> cleared.
> 
> diff --git a/repair/dir2.c b/repair/dir2.c
> index 9e6c67d..8ecc29b 100644
> --- a/repair/dir2.c
> +++ b/repair/dir2.c
> @@ -1318,6 +1318,18 @@ _("entry \"%*.*s\" at block %d offset %" PRIdPTR " in directory inode %" PRIu64
>  				dep->namelen, dep->namelen, dep->name,
>  				da_bno, (intptr_t)ptr - (intptr_t)d, ino,
>  				clearreason, ent_ino);
> +
> +		/*
> +		 * We have a special dot & dotdot fixer-upper below which can
> +		 * sort out the proper inode number, so don't clear it.
> +		 */
> +		if ((dep->namelen == 1 && dep->name[0] == '.') ||
> +		    (dep->namelen == 2 &&
> +		     dep->name[0] == '.' && dep->name[1] == '.')) {
> +			clearino = 0;
> +			clearreason = NULL;
> +		}
> +
>  		/*
>  		 * If the name length is 0 (illegal) make it 1 and blast
>  		 * the entry.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> xfs mailing list
> xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
> http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs




[Index of Archives]     [Linux XFS Devel]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux