On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 09:20:36AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 6:10 AM, Mel Gorman <mgorman@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > I believe you're correct and it matches what was observed. I'm still > > travelling and wireless is dirt but managed to queue a test using pmd_dirty > > Ok, thanks. > > I'm not entirely happy with that change, and I suspect the whole > heuristic should be looked at much more (maybe it should also look at > whether it's executable, for example), but it's a step in the right > direction. > I can follow up when I'm back in work properly. As you have already pulled this in directly, can you also consider pulling in "mm: thp: return the correct value for change_huge_pmd" please? The other two patches were very minor can be resent through the normal paths later. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
