Re: [PATCH] xfs: ensure truncate forces zeroed blocks to disk

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfs: ensure truncate forces zeroed blocks to disk
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2015 12:51:09 -0800
Cc: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <1424299725-26067-1-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)

This looks correct, but is there a good (performance) reason against
simply unconditionally flushing and waiting?

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] xfs: ensure truncate forces zeroed blocks to disk
  - From: Dave Chinner

References:
- [PATCH] xfs: ensure truncate forces zeroed blocks to disk
  - From: Dave Chinner

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 2/2] xfs: clarify async write failure ratelimit message
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 1/2] xfs: log unmount events on console
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] xfs: ensure truncate forces zeroed blocks to disk
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] xfs: ensure truncate forces zeroed blocks to disk
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux XFS Devel] [Linux Filesystem Development] [Filesystem Testing] [Linux USB Devel] [Linux Audio Users] [Yosemite News] [Linux Kernel] [Linux SCSI]

Powered by Linux