Per Dave,
The error messages document the reason for the checks better than the comment
and the comments about volume mounts date back to Irix and so aren't relevant
any more. So just remove the old and redundant comment.
Signed-off-by: Wang Sheng-Hui <shhuiw@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_sb.c | 8 --------
1 file changed, 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_sb.c b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_sb.c
index 752915f..b231c59 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_sb.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_sb.c
@@ -174,14 +174,6 @@ xfs_mount_validate_sb(
bool check_inprogress,
bool check_version)
{
-
- /*
- * If the log device and data device have the
- * same device number, the log is internal.
- * Consequently, the sb_logstart should be non-zero. If
- * we have a zero sb_logstart in this case, we may be trying to mount
- * a volume filesystem in a non-volume manner.
- */
if (sbp->sb_magicnum != XFS_SB_MAGIC) {
xfs_warn(mp, "bad magic number");
return -EWRONGFS;
--
2.1.2
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
