On Thu, Feb 05, 2015 at 09:10:44AM -0500, Brian Foster wrote:
> > /* apply remaining deltas */
> > + spin_lock(&mp->m_sb_lock);
> > if (rtxdelta) {
> > - error = xfs_mod_frextents(mp, rtxdelta);
> > + error = xfs_sb_mod64(&mp->m_sb.sb_frextents, rtxdelta);
>
> Any reason why we don't continue to use the xfs_mod_frextents() function
> introduced in the previous patch? Seems like we should be consistent one
> way or the other.
We're already under the sb_lock and would need another lock roundtrip to
avoid a deadlock in that case. But mit might be worth to simply make
the real time extent counter a percpu one to behave similar to the other
counters that can be manipulated outside of the transaction commit code.
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
