> This bothers me a little: cl_addr is just the address that the > exchange_id came from. In theory there's no one-to-one relationship > between NFSv4 clients and IP addresses. Is it likely the iscsi traffic > could use a different interface than the MDS traffic? > > If this is the best we can do, then maybe this should at least be > documented. The pNFS block fencing protocol bothers me a lot, it seems like very little thought went into that part of the standard. I proposed a new SCSI layout type that fixes those issues on the NFSv4 WG list, but there's been zero interest in it: http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/nfsv4/current/msg13469.html _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
