On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 12:08:21PM +0100, Emmanuel Florac wrote:
> Le Mon, 15 Dec 2014 13:25:00 +0100
> Emmanuel Florac <eflorac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> écrivait:
>
> > Reading the source I see that the error occured in xfs_buf_read_map, I
> > suppose it's when xfsbufd tries to scan dirty metadata? This is a read
> > error, so it could very well be a simple IO starvation at the
> > controller level (as the controller probably gives priority to
> > whatever writes are pending over reads).
> >
> > Maybe setting xfsbufd_centisecs to the max could help here? Trying
> > right away... Any advice welcome.
> >
>
> Alas, same thing;
>
> dmesg output:
>
>
> ffff8800df1f5020: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................
> ffff8800df1f5030: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................
> XFS (dm-0): Metadata corruption detected at xfs_inode_buf_verify+0x6c/0xb0, block 0xeffffff40
> XFS (dm-0): Unmount and run xfs_repair
> XFS (dm-0): First 64 bytes of corrupted metadata buffer:
> ffff8800df1f5000: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................
> ffff8800df1f5010: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................
> ffff8800df1f5020: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................
> ffff8800df1f5030: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................
> XFS (dm-0): Metadata corruption detected at xfs_inode_buf_verify+0x6c/0xb0, block 0xeffffff40
> XFS (dm-0): Unmount and run xfs_repair
So the underlying storage stack is returning zeros without any IO
errors here. It's probably a lookup operation, so it simply fails
and returns the error to userspace. Every one of these messages is a
separate read IO, but they are all returning zeros.
....
> XFS (dm-0): First 64 bytes of corrupted metadata buffer:
> ffff8800df1f5000: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................
> ffff8800df1f5010: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................
> ffff8800df1f5020: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................
> ffff8800df1f5030: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................
> XFS (dm-0): metadata I/O error: block 0xeffffff40 ("xfs_trans_read_buf_map") error 117 numblks 16
> XFS (dm-0): xfs_do_force_shutdown(0x1) called from line 383 of file fs/xfs/xfs_trans_buf.c. Return address = 0xffffffff8125cc90
> XFS (dm-0): I/O Error Detected. Shutting down filesystem
> XFS (dm-0): Please umount the filesystem and rectify the problem(s)
> XFS (dm-0): xfs_imap_to_bp: xfs_trans_read_buf() returned error 117.
> XFS (dm-0): xfs_log_force: error 5 returned.
> XFS (dm-0): xfs_log_force: error 5 returned.
And here the same read error has occurred in a dirty transaction,
and so the filesystem shut down.
> There is no IO error at the RAID controller level, at all. The buffer
> hasn't been overwritten with zeros, I'm pretty sure it actually timed
> out and just read nothing. This is not a case for an IO error IMO, a
> retry would almost certainly succeed; after all the problem occurred
> after more than 8 hours of continuous heavy read/write activity.
What you see above is a persistent corruption that has been
reported several times as XFS has errored out and then re-read
the data from disk multiple times. A retry would most certainly
return zeros again.
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
