On Wed 26-11-14 18:28:32, Eric Sandeen wrote: > On 11/26/14 4:18 PM, Dave Chinner wrote: > > >> Or am I missing something ... > > > > Nope, I'm confusing different reporting command behaviour.... > > Ok, so back to the original question: think it's cool to drop > the verbose requirement to find out limits when there is 0 usage? Just as a data point quota(1) command from quota-tools also doesn't report quota entries where no space & inode is accounted without -v option. I never thought it's particularly useful but apparently it's some heritage from the original implementation of quota in some Unix and so I decided to maintain compatibility... Honza -- Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx> SUSE Labs, CR _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
