On Nov 11, 2014, at 8:36 AM, Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 11/11/2014 04:22 AM, Cyril Scetbon wrote: >> That's what I've read first, but someone showed me a sample where it works. He just told me he was using project quota. However, does it make sense ? >> I've also read somewhere else that quota is never enforced for root user (id,gid=0) that's why I was testing it .... > > No, it doesn't make sense. Why would you want to enforce quotas for root? A week ago I tried this and project quotas appear to apply to root. [root@localhost project_quota_test1]# xfs_quota -c df Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Available Use% Pathname /dev/sdb 83845120 157980 83687140 0% /xfs_local /dev/sdb 102400 124928 9223372036854753280 122% /xfs_local/project_quota_test1 [root@localhost project_quota_test1]# dd if=/dev/zero of=test100MB bs=1M count=100 dd: error writing ‘test100MB’: No space left on device 79+0 records in 78+0 records out 81788928 bytes (82 MB) copied, 0.163849 s, 499 MB/s [root@localhost project_quota_test1]# xfs_quota -c df Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Available Use% Pathname /dev/sdb 83845120 237748 83607372 0% /xfs_local /dev/sdb 102400 204800 9223372036854673408 200% /xfs_local/project_quota_test1 The available space value seems like a bug, at least it’s not a sane/helpful value. But I do get a no space left on device, and the file being written is truncated at the hard limit for that project (directory). Chris Murphy _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
