On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 04:15:35PM -0600, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> After ffe9a9a xfsprogs: xfs_copy: fix data corruption of target,
> xfs_copy started hitting an ASSERT for a 4k sector / 4k blocksize
> filesystem:
>
> # dd if=/dev/zero of=test.img bs=1M count=1024
> # mkfs.xfs -s size=4096 test.img
> # xfs_copy test.img xfs.img
> xfs_copy: xfs_copy.c:720: main: Assertion `((((((xfs_daddr_t)(3 << (mp)->m_sectbb_log)) + 1) * (1<<9)) + first_residue) % source_blocksize) == 0' failed.
> Aborted
>
> I started digging through all the calculations below, and realized
> that in the end, all it wants is the first filesystem block after
> the AG header. XFS_AGFL_BLOCK(mp) + 1 suffices for this purpose;
> rip out the rest which seems overly complex and apparently bug-prone.
>
> I tested this by creating a 4g filesystem with combinations of
> sector & block size between 512 and 4k, copying in /lib/modules,
> running an xfs_copy of that, and running repair against the copy;
> it all looks good. It took a long time, but I will create a
> simpler/shorter xfstest based on this.
>
> Reported-by: Zorro Lang <zlang@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
Looks Ok to me:
Reviewed-by: Brian Foster <bfoster@xxxxxxxxxx>
I just noticed the bug... so the problem was basically the assumption
that sector size == BBSIZE?
Brian
>
> diff --git a/copy/xfs_copy.c b/copy/xfs_copy.c
> index 7ce5ec9..279527c 100644
> --- a/copy/xfs_copy.c
> +++ b/copy/xfs_copy.c
> @@ -475,7 +475,7 @@ main(int argc, char **argv)
> int open_flags;
> xfs_off_t pos, end_pos;
> size_t length;
> - int c, first_residue, tmp_residue;
> + int c;
> __uint64_t size, sizeb;
> __uint64_t numblocks = 0;
> int wblocks = 0;
> @@ -697,27 +697,13 @@ main(int argc, char **argv)
> ASSERT(source_blocksize % source_sectorsize == 0);
> ASSERT(source_sectorsize % BBSIZE == 0);
>
> - if (source_blocksize > source_sectorsize) {
> - /* get number of leftover sectors in last block of ag header */
> -
> - tmp_residue = ((XFS_AGFL_DADDR(mp) + 1) * BBSIZE)
> - % source_blocksize;
> - first_residue = (tmp_residue == 0) ? 0 :
> - source_blocksize - tmp_residue;
> - ASSERT(first_residue % source_sectorsize == 0);
> - } else if (source_blocksize == source_sectorsize) {
> - first_residue = 0;
> - } else {
> + if (source_blocksize < source_sectorsize) {
> do_log(_("Error: filesystem block size is smaller than the"
> " disk sectorsize.\nAborting XFS copy now.\n"));
> exit(1);
> }
>
> - first_agbno = (((XFS_AGFL_DADDR(mp) + 1) * BBSIZE)
> - + first_residue) / source_blocksize;
> - ASSERT(first_agbno != 0);
> - ASSERT(((((XFS_AGFL_DADDR(mp) + 1) * BBSIZE)
> - + first_residue) % source_blocksize) == 0);
> + first_agbno = XFS_AGFL_BLOCK(mp) + 1;
>
> /* now open targets */
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> xfs mailing list
> xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
> http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
