On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 09:24:28PM +0200, Jan Kara wrote: > I don't see the 4-bytes per inode saving, what am I missing? Frankly, I > don't see a difference in readability but since you and Al agree on that I > concede to your taste :) It's the removal of s_inode_fields that saves 4 bytes. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
