On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 05:04:57PM -0400, Brian Foster wrote: > The function rename seems unnecessary..? Meh, not a big deal to me > either way. Otherwise, this one seems Ok. Yeah, we might as well keep the old name. As far as I'm concerned I'd love to get rid of the two different IOPS in the VFS, too. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
