On Sat, Oct 11, 2014 at 06:34:52AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > I still very much disagree with the s_inode_fields indirection. Please > find a patch below to remove it, and use a get_dquots super_block > operation instead. This leads to less and better readable code, > and serves 4 bytes in every inode in the system. Additionally the > indirection could easily be optimized away by directly passing the > dquot array in various functions, but for now I'd like to keep it > simple. Indeed. This "array of offsets" approach is asking for trouble. Please, don't go there - playing that way with type safety is a bad idea. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
