On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 02:44:36AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 07:03:30AM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote: > > I can mention it, but it's so trivial I didn't think it was worth > > it. > > It does change behavior, so it should document why that was changed. > > > The changelog says "Hence allow the caller to pass in the freeze > > level it is allowed to write" which is exactly what this code is > > doing. > > The changelog says the you can pass the argument now. It doesn't > say that it did change a caller to pass a different argument, and more > importanly why. > Note that iirc the patch I posted had a bug so this one is preferred, but feel free to steal the commit log/problem description from the old one: http://oss.sgi.com/archives/xfs/2014-08/msg00073.html Brian > _______________________________________________ > xfs mailing list > xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx > http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
