Re: compiling xfs-progs 3.2.x

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 9/23/14 11:41 AM, Emmanuel Florac wrote:
> 
> Hi list,
> xfs-progs 3.1.x compile easily, however I can't get around compiling
> 3.2.x (debian 7.6) :
> 
>  ./configure
> ./configure: line 2098: AC_PROG_LIBTOOL: command not found
> ./configure: line 2204: syntax error near unexpected token `xfsprogs'
> ./configure: line 2204: `AC_PACKAGE_GLOBALS(xfsprogs)'
> 
> Any hint on where to start would be appreciated. Libtool version is the
> same as testing and unstable (2.4.2).
> 
> Thanks,
> 

I'm not at all autoconf savvy, so just guessing here.

there were very few changes to configure.ac since v3.1.11:


diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac
index b968977..ae17c68 100644
--- a/configure.ac
+++ b/configure.ac
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-AC_INIT([xfsprogs], [3.1.11])
+AC_INIT([xfsprogs], [3.2.0-alpha2])
 AC_PREREQ(2.50)
 AC_CONFIG_AUX_DIR([.])
 AC_CONFIG_MACRO_DIR([m4])
@@ -112,12 +112,14 @@ AC_HAVE_FIEMAP
 AC_HAVE_PREADV
 AC_HAVE_SYNC_FILE_RANGE
 AC_HAVE_BLKID_TOPO($enable_blkid)
+AC_HAVE_READDIR
 
 AC_CHECK_SIZEOF([long])
 AC_CHECK_SIZEOF([char *])
 AC_TYPE_PSINT
 AC_TYPE_PSUNSIGNED
 AC_TYPE_U32
+AC_TYPE_UMODE_T
 AC_MANUAL_FORMAT
 
 AC_CONFIG_FILES([include/builddefs])


if you do a make realclean & re-make, does it help?  (if you check out v3.1.11 and do the same, does it still build?)

-Eric

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs




[Index of Archives]     [Linux XFS Devel]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux