> > So 250kB bloat -- and what does this fix exactly? > > We're trying to address the size issue by only loading the module when I'm not sure this is really addressing it. > it's needed, but yeah it's big. Open to suggestions on how best to deal > with that. I understand the sticker shock. I don't even understand why you need the whole table. You want to not compare some special symbols, and a few other symbols are equivalent to others. But most symbols are only identical to themselves. Couldn't you have a much smaller table that only expresses the exceptions? > As far as telling the customer "don't do that", my guess is that they > would just go elsewhere. There are several other options for > filesystems that support unicode. They could put some code into their user app that generates an unique representation. -Andi _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
