> @@ -3556,14 +3622,10 @@ xlog_recover_process_data(
> xfs_caddr_t dp,
> int pass)
> {
> + struct xlog_op_header *ohead;
> xfs_caddr_t lp;
> int num_logops;
> int error;
>
> lp = dp + be32_to_cpu(rhead->h_len);
> num_logops = be32_to_cpu(rhead->h_num_logops);
> @@ -3573,69 +3635,24 @@ xlog_recover_process_data(
> return -EIO;
>
> while ((dp < lp) && num_logops) {
> + ASSERT(dp + sizeof(struct xlog_op_header) <= lp);
> +
> + ohead = (struct xlog_op_header *)dp;
> + dp += sizeof(*ohead);
Using sizeof type and sizeof variable for the same thing right next
to each other seems weird. Also why duplicate the addition instead
of moving it below the assignment:
ohead = (struct xlog_op_header *)dp;
dp += sizeof(*ohead);
ASSERT(dp <= lp);
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
