On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 08:03:19PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> rbpp is always passed into xfs_rtmodify_summary
> and xfs_rtget_summary, so there is no need to
> test for it in xfs_rtmodify_summary_int.
>
Looks fine, but this is also called through a variety of twisty paths.
Could we add a top-level error check or assert?
Brian
> Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_rtbitmap.c b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_rtbitmap.c
> index 50e3b93..7c818f1 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_rtbitmap.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_rtbitmap.c
> @@ -460,7 +460,7 @@ xfs_rtmodify_summary_int(
> /*
> * If we have an old buffer, and the block number matches, use that.
> */
> - if (rbpp && *rbpp && *rsb == sb)
> + if (*rbpp && *rsb == sb)
> bp = *rbpp;
> /*
> * Otherwise we have to get the buffer.
> @@ -469,7 +469,7 @@ xfs_rtmodify_summary_int(
> /*
> * If there was an old one, get rid of it first.
> */
> - if (rbpp && *rbpp)
> + if (*rbpp)
> xfs_trans_brelse(tp, *rbpp);
> error = xfs_rtbuf_get(mp, tp, sb, 1, &bp);
> if (error) {
> @@ -478,10 +478,8 @@ xfs_rtmodify_summary_int(
> /*
> * Remember this buffer and block for the next call.
> */
> - if (rbpp) {
> - *rbpp = bp;
> - *rsb = sb;
> - }
> + *rbpp = bp;
> + *rsb = sb;
> }
> /*
> * Point to the summary information, modify/log it, and/or copy it out.
> @@ -493,14 +491,8 @@ xfs_rtmodify_summary_int(
> *sp += delta;
> xfs_trans_log_buf(tp, bp, first, first + sizeof(*sp) - 1);
> }
> - if (sum) {
> - /*
> - * Drop the buffer if we're not asked to remember it.
> - */
> - if (!rbpp)
> - xfs_trans_brelse(tp, bp);
> + if (sum)
> *sum = *sp;
> - }
> return 0;
> }
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> xfs mailing list
> xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
> http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
