On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 08:48:24AM -0400, Brian Foster wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 03:09:09PM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_aops.c
> > @@ -1753,11 +1753,69 @@ xfs_vm_readpages(
> > return mpage_readpages(mapping, pages, nr_pages, xfs_get_blocks);
> > }
> >
> > +/*
> > + * This is basically a copy of __set_page_dirty_buffers() with one
> > + * small tweak: buffers beyond EOF do not get marked dirty. If we mark them
> > + * dirty, we'll never be able to clean them because we don't write buffers
> > + * beyond EOF, and that means we can't invalidate pages that span EOF
> > + * that have been marked dirty. Further, the dirty state can leak into
> > + * the file interior if the file is extended, resulting in all sorts of
> > + * bad things happening as the state does not match the unerlying data.
> > + */
> > +STATIC int
> > +xfs_vm_set_page_dirty(
> > + struct page *page)
> > +{
> > + struct address_space *mapping = page_mapping(page);
>
> This breaks xfs as a kernel module:
>
> $ make -j 8 M=fs/xfs
> Building modules, stage 2.
> MODPOST 1 modules
> WARNING: "page_mapping" [fs/xfs/xfs.ko] undefined!
> ...
Oh, that should just be:
+ struct address_space *mapping = page->mapping;
> I suppose we could export that symbol, but why wouldn't we just propose
> this change to __set_page_dirty_buffers()?
I'm not going to risk breaking other filesystems that have implicit
dependencies on buffers beyond EOF being dirtied.
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
