On Tue, Aug 05, 2014 at 09:44:16PM -0700, Hans Wennborg wrote:
> The prefix suggests the number should be printed in hex, so use
> the %x specifier to do that.
>
> Found by using regex suggested by Joe Perches.
>
> Signed-off-by: Hans Wennborg <hans@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> fs/xfs/xfs_discard.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_discard.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_discard.c
> index 13d08a1..b4a2415 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_discard.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_discard.c
> @@ -228,7 +228,7 @@ xfs_discard_extents(
> GFP_NOFS, 0);
> if (error && error != -EOPNOTSUPP) {
> xfs_info(mp,
> - "discard failed for extent [0x%llu,%u], error %d",
> + "discard failed for extent [0x%llx,%u], error %d",
> (unsigned long long)busyp->bno,
> busyp->length,
> error);
It's kind of annoying seeing values of multiple bases being used to
describe a single extent, imo. But using 0x before a decimal value
certainly isn't nice... ;)
Reviewed-by: Brian Foster <bfoster@xxxxxxxxxx>
> --
> 2.0.0.526.g5318336
>
> _______________________________________________
> xfs mailing list
> xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
> http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
