On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 10:25:36AM -0400, Brian Foster wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 06:06:18PM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 02:23:59AM -0500, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > > This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was
> > > generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing
> > > the project "XFS development tree".
> > >
> > > The branch, xfs-libxfs-restructure has been updated
> > > discards fcec2eb6a31bde491f4ce9ddd94b41c8aacccd43 (commit)
> > > discards e3584e38615389850684fcffd699d97e2e06f2d6 (commit)
> > > discards f212d6fcf5c1cc3a3980dd320804c1dfb9f49b75 (commit)
> > > discards e10404cf914273de8016d5992c7049bdb9a9a089 (commit)
> > > discards f3a19b3ad85dcc4a073270e1fb594eff37709788 (commit)
> > > discards d5a6cda3cf2c0860543db26bb5df7ed4404f74cd (commit)
> > > c59a5ac xfs: global error sign conversion
> > > 63d512e libxfs: move source files
> > > 547a71f libxfs: move header files
> > > 62c9454 xfs: create libxfs infrastructure
> > > b474c7a xfs: Nuke XFS_ERROR macro
> > > d99831f xfs: return is not a function
> > > 16b9057 Merge branch 'for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/viro/vfs
> > > 9c1d528 Merge commit '9f12600fe425bc28f0ccba034a77783c09c15af4' into for-linus
> > > 8d02076 ->splice_write() via ->write_iter()
> > > 412dd3a Merge tag 'xfs-for-linus-3.16-rc1' of git://oss.sgi.com/xfs/xfs
> > > 23adbe1 fs,userns: Change inode_capable to capable_wrt_inode_uidgid
> > > bf97f3b xfs: switch to ->write_iter()
> > > b4f5d2c xfs: switch to ->read_iter()
> > > b318891 xfs: trim the argument lists of xfs_file_{dio,buffered}_aio_write()
> > > 0c94933 iov_iter_truncate()
> > > 71d8e53 start adding the tag to iov_iter
> > > 31b1403 switch {__,}blockdev_direct_IO() to iov_iter
> > > a6cbcd4 get rid of pointless iov_length() in ->direct_IO()
> > > d8d3d94 pass iov_iter to ->direct_IO()
> > > cb66a7a kill generic_segment_checks()
> > > f8579f8 generic_file_direct_write(): switch to iov_iter
> > > from fcec2eb6a31bde491f4ce9ddd94b41c8aacccd43 (commit)
> > >
> > > Those revisions listed above that are new to this repository have
> > > not appeared on any other notification email; so we list those
> > > revisions in full, below.
> >
> > This looks like a lot of non-libxfs changes, but it's mostly just
> > noise from the rebase from 3.15.0 to the current master branch at
> > 3.16-rc2.
> >
> > I've added all the negation fixes that Brian noted, and tested all
> > the different config options (m,y,n) for the libxfs restructure. I
> > haven't come across any problems over the weekend, so I'd like to
> > push this out so that we can get this dev cycle properly underway.
> > If people can ack this, I'll add all the appropriate sign-offs and
> > push it.
> >
>
> The changes look good to me and I don't see any failures that aren't
> common with for-next, so:
>
> Reviewed-by: Brian Foster <bfoster@xxxxxxxxxx>
Thanks, Brian.
> That said, I am seeing a BUG() on for-next kernels via repeated xfs/297
> runs. Output is appended below.
Yup, I'm still seeing those stale delalloc block asserts quite
regularly. There was a lull after the last round of fixes I did, but
in the last couple of months they've beena regular occurrence in my
testing again...
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
