On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 10:14:31AM -0400, Brian Foster wrote: > Given that the existence of the string indicates large block/inode > numbers, shouldn't we leave it to avoid any confusion? That aside, the > rest of the patch looks fine to me. As these have been enabled in any sane configuration I don't really see a point in printing these. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
