On Tue, Jun 03, 2014 at 10:53:58AM -0400, Brian Foster wrote:
> XFS can allocate significant amounts of space to files via speculative
> preallocation. Such preallocation may not be reclaimed automatically on
> file close() if a file is repeatedly opened and extended. For smaller
> filesystems with relatively large and slow growing files, this
> preallocation can linger for some time, including contributing to out of
> space conditions.
>
> Create a situation where an fs is near out of space while several files
> still have lingering, significant preallocations. Verify that new
> writers reclaim the preallocated space rather than return ENOSPC. Repeat
> a similar test for quota limits and EDQUOT.
>
> Signed-off-by: Brian Foster <bfoster@xxxxxxxxxx>
Couple of minor things.
> +# Create a file using a repeated open, extending write and close pattern. This
> +# causes the preallocation to persist after the file is closed. Preallocation
> +# will not be reclaimed unless the inode is evicted or we hit an allocation
> +# failure.
> +_spec_prealloc_file()
> +{
> + file=$1
> +
> + rm -f $file
> +
> + # a few file extending open-write-close cycles should be enough to
> + # trigger the fs to retain preallocation. write 256k in 32k intervals to
> + # be sure
> + for i in $(seq 0 32768 262144)
> + do
for .... ; do
> + $XFS_IO_PROG -fc "pwrite $i 32k" $file | \
> + _filter_xfs_io >> $seqres.full
> + done
If you are dumping the output into $seqres.full, then it doesn't
need to be filtered. Filtering is only necessary for golden image
matching; $seqres.full is for debug output and so should be
pristine...
Also, I prefer $XFS_IO_PROG -f -c "..." (separate -c "...") because
the -c arg must be followed by the command and so order is
important...
> + # write a 4k aligned amount of data to keep the calculations simple
> + $XFS_IO_PROG -c "pwrite 0 128m" $file | _filter_xfs_io >> $seqres.full
> +
> + size=`stat -c "%s" $file`
> + blocks=`stat -c "%b" $file`
> + blocksize=`stat -c "%B" $file`
> +
> + prealloc_size=$((blocks * blocksize - size))
> + if [ $prealloc_size -eq 0 ]
> + then
if [ ... ]; then
> + echo "Warning: No speculative preallocation for $file." \
> + "Check use of the allocsize= mount option."
> + fi
> +
> + # keep a running total of how much preallocation we've created
> + TOTAL_PREALLOC=$((TOTAL_PREALLOC + prealloc_size))
> +}
> +
> +_consume_free_space()
> +{
> + dir=$1
> +
> + # calculate the rough amount of free space in MB
> + fsblocksize=`$XFS_IO_PROG -x -c "statfs" $dir | grep f_bsize | \
> + awk '{ print $3 }'`
> + blocksavail=`$XFS_IO_PROG -x -c "statfs" $dir | grep f_bavail | \
> + awk '{ print $3 }'`
> + freesp=$((fsblocksize * blocksavail / 1024 / 1024))
> +
> + # allocate all but 10MB
> + freesp=$((freesp - 10))
freesp=`$DF_PROG -m $dir | awk '/^\// { print $4 - 10 }'`
> + $XFS_IO_PROG -fc "falloc 0 ${freesp}M" $dir/spc
> +}
> +
> +# Create several files with preallocation and consume the remaining free space
> +# via fallocate to the put the fs at ENOSPC. Create a set of background writers
> +# to write into ENOSPC and cause the preallocation to be reclaimed and
> +# reallocated to the new writers.
> +_test_enospc()
> +{
> + dir=$1
> +
> + rm -rf $dir/*
> +
> + TOTAL_PREALLOC=0
> + for i in $(seq 0 3)
> + do
for (); do
> + _spec_prealloc_file $dir/pre$i
> + done
> +
> + _consume_free_space $dir
> +
> + # consume 1/2 of the current preallocation across the set of 4 writers
> + write_size=$((TOTAL_PREALLOC / 2 / 4))
> + for i in $(seq 0 3)
> + do
> + $XFS_IO_PROG -fc "pwrite 0 $write_size" $dir/file.$i | \
> + _filter_xfs_io >> $seqres.full &
no filter, for (); do
> + done
> +
> + wait
> +}
> +
> +# Create preallocations accounted by both user and group quotas. Set the
> +# associated quota hard limits to put them at EDQUOT. Verify that a new writer
> +# reclaims the preallocated space and proceeds without error.
> +_test_edquot()
> +{
> + dir=$1
> +
> + rm -rf $dir/*
> +
> + TOTAL_PREALLOC=0
> + _spec_prealloc_file $dir/user
> + chown $qa_user $dir/user
> +
> + _spec_prealloc_file $dir/group
> + chgrp $qa_group $dir/group
> +
> + # writing to a file under both quotas means both will be reclaimed on
> + # allocation failure
> + touch $dir/file
> + chown $qa_user $dir/file
> + chgrp $qa_group $dir/file
> +
> + # put both quotas at EDQUOT
> + blks=`$XFS_QUOTA_PROG -xc "quota -u $qa_user" $dir | \
> + tail -n 1 | awk '{ print $2 }'`
> + $XFS_QUOTA_PROG -xc "limit -u bhard=${blks}k $qa_user" $dir
> + blks=`$XFS_QUOTA_PROG -xc "quota -g $qa_grup" $dir | \
> + tail -n 1 | awk '{ print $2 }'`
> + $XFS_QUOTA_PROG -xc "limit -g bhard=${blks}k $qa_group" $dir
> +
> + # each quota has a single file worth of preallocation to reclaim. leave
> + # some wiggle room and write to 1/3 the total.
> + write_size=$((TOTAL_PREALLOC / 3))
> + $XFS_IO_PROG -c "pwrite 0 $write_size" $dir/file | \
> + _filter_xfs_io >> $seqres.full
no filter.
> +}
> +
> +# real QA test starts here
> +_supported_fs xfs
> +_supported_os Linux
> +
> +_require_scratch
> +_require_xfs_io_command "falloc"
> +_require_loop
> +_require_quota
> +_require_user
> +_require_group
> +
> +rm -f $seqres.full
> +
> +_scratch_mkfs_xfs | _filter_mkfs >> $seqres.full 2>&1
> +_scratch_mount
> +
> +# make sure the background eofblocks scanner doesn't interfere
> +orig_sp_time=`cat /proc/sys/fs/xfs/speculative_prealloc_lifetime`
> +echo 9999 > /proc/sys/fs/xfs/speculative_prealloc_lifetime
> +
> +LOOP_FILE=$SCRATCH_MNT/$seq.fs
> +LOOP_MNT=$SCRATCH_MNT/$seq.mnt
> +
> +$MKFS_XFS_PROG -d "file=1,name=$LOOP_FILE,size=$((1024*1024*1024 * 10))" | \
> + _filter_mkfs >> $seqres.full 2>&1
mkfs takes "size=10g" as a valid size.
> +mkdir -p $LOOP_MNT
> +mount -t xfs -o loop,uquota,gquota $LOOP_FILE $LOOP_MNT || \
> + _fail "Failed to mount loop fs."
> +
> +_test_enospc $LOOP_MNT
> +_test_edquot $LOOP_MNT
> +
> +umount $LOOP_MNT
> +
> +echo $orig_sp_time > /proc/sys/fs/xfs/speculative_prealloc_lifetime
> +
> +umount $SCRATCH_MNT
> +_check_scratch_fs
> +
> +status=0
> +exit
> diff --git a/tests/xfs/014.out b/tests/xfs/014.out
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..a825535
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tests/xfs/014.out
> @@ -0,0 +1 @@
> +QA output created by 014
The test writes nothing to the output file? Perhaps it should
indicate that (silence is golden....)....
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
