On Fri, 30 May 2014, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > a) is this the right approach in general? The previous discussion > pointed this way, but there may be other opinions. The syscall changes seem like the sort of thing I'd expect, although patches adding new syscalls or otherwise affecting the kernel/userspace interface (as opposed to those relating to an individual filesystem) should go to linux-api as well as other relevant lists. -- Joseph S. Myers joseph@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
