On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 03:06:22PM -0400, Brian Foster wrote:
> On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 10:03:41AM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > From: Dave Chinner <dchinner@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > fs/xfs/xfs_da_btree.h | 15 +++++++--------
> > fs/xfs/xfs_dir2.c | 4 ++--
> > fs/xfs/xfs_dir2_data.c | 4 ++--
> > fs/xfs/xfs_dir2_leaf.c | 21 +++++++++++----------
> > fs/xfs/xfs_dir2_node.c | 41 +++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
> > fs/xfs/xfs_dir2_readdir.c | 6 +++---
> > 6 files changed, 48 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_da_btree.h b/fs/xfs/xfs_da_btree.h
> > index e9496a9..8db83fc 100644
> > --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_da_btree.h
> > +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_da_btree.h
> > @@ -232,9 +232,9 @@ xfs_dir2_db_off_to_byte(struct xfs_da_geometry *geo, xfs_dir2_db_t db,
> > * Convert block (DB) to block (dablk)
> > */
> > static inline xfs_dablk_t
> > -xfs_dir2_db_to_da(struct xfs_mount *mp, xfs_dir2_db_t db)
> > +xfs_dir2_db_to_da(struct xfs_da_geometry *geo, xfs_dir2_db_t db)
> > {
> > - return (xfs_dablk_t)(db << mp->m_sb.sb_dirblklog);
> > + return (xfs_dablk_t)(db << (geo->blklog - geo->fsblog));
> > }
> >
> > /*
> > @@ -243,7 +243,7 @@ xfs_dir2_db_to_da(struct xfs_mount *mp, xfs_dir2_db_t db)
> > static inline xfs_dablk_t
> > xfs_dir2_byte_to_da(struct xfs_mount *mp, xfs_dir2_off_t by)
> > {
> > - return xfs_dir2_db_to_da(mp, xfs_dir2_byte_to_db(mp, by));
> > + return xfs_dir2_db_to_da(mp->m_dir_geo, xfs_dir2_byte_to_db(mp, by));
> > }
> >
> > /*
> > @@ -261,19 +261,18 @@ xfs_dir2_db_off_to_dataptr(struct xfs_mount *mp, xfs_dir2_db_t db,
> > * Convert block (dablk) to block (DB)
> > */
> > static inline xfs_dir2_db_t
> > -xfs_dir2_da_to_db(struct xfs_mount *mp, xfs_dablk_t da)
> > +xfs_dir2_da_to_db(struct xfs_da_geometry *geo, xfs_dablk_t da)
> > {
> > - return (xfs_dir2_db_t)(da >> mp->m_sb.sb_dirblklog);
> > + return (xfs_dir2_db_t)(da >> (geo->blklog - geo->fsblog));
> > }
> >
> > /*
> > * Convert block (dablk) to byte offset in space
> > */
> > static inline xfs_dir2_off_t
> > -xfs_dir2_da_to_byte(struct xfs_mount *mp, xfs_dablk_t da)
> > +xfs_dir2_da_to_byte(struct xfs_da_geometry *geo, xfs_dablk_t da)
> > {
> > - return xfs_dir2_db_off_to_byte(mp->m_dir_geo,
> > - xfs_dir2_da_to_db(mp, da), 0);
> > + return xfs_dir2_db_off_to_byte(geo, xfs_dir2_da_to_db(geo, da), 0);
> > }
>
> Is it a problem that we convert a dablk to a db block on the way to a
> byte conversion? i.e., that seems like a lossy conversion, assuming I am
> correctly understanding that a dablk is equivalent to a filesystem block
> and a db block is a directory block (1 or more dablks).
It's not lossy, because the only way that directory blocks are
physically indexed is by the start address of the block. That is:
sb_dirblklog = 2
db blockk index 0 1 2
dir block map +---------------+---------------+
bmbt map +---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
dablk index 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
The only time non-sb_dirblklog aligned dablk values are used are
during discontiguous buffer operations The mapping code in
xfs_dabuf_map() is the only code that needs to know about the
intermediate dablk indexes to be able to map and build the
discontiguous buffers. otherwise dablk increases by 4 counts for
every directory block and the other indexes are never directly used.
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
