On Thu, May 08, 2014 at 11:04:10PM +0200, Emmanuel Florac wrote: > Le Thu, 08 May 2014 15:40:57 -0500 vous écriviez: > > > *shrug* ok. Let a thousand "hey my xfs_check OOM'd" emails > > blossom! :) > > > > FWIW, I did not have time to work on that prefetch bug yet today. :( > > > > Why not replace it by a script that simply states that it's useless and > to run xfs_repair -n instead? It has been completely useless for the > best part of the past ten years... This way you don't remove it but > you'll sort of fix it :) xfs_check is already just a script that wraps xfs_db. However, there's all the man page updates, all the external documentation needs to be updated, etc. IOWs, it's not just a case of a simply patching out the xfs_check script.... Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs