[PATCH] xfs: remove XFS_TRANS_RESERVE in collapse range

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



There is no need to dip into reserve pool. Reserve pool is used for much
more important things. And xfs_trans_reserve will never return ENOSPC
because punch hole is already done. If we get ENOSPC, collapse range
will be simply failed.

Signed-off-by: Namjae Jeon <namjae.jeon@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Ashish Sangwan <a.sangwan@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 fs/xfs/xfs_bmap_util.c | 3 +--
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_bmap_util.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_bmap_util.c
index 296160b..91a43c5 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_bmap_util.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_bmap_util.c
@@ -1519,7 +1519,6 @@ xfs_collapse_file_space(
 
 	while (!error && !done) {
 		tp = xfs_trans_alloc(mp, XFS_TRANS_DIOSTRAT);
-		tp->t_flags |= XFS_TRANS_RESERVE;
 		/*
 		 * We would need to reserve permanent block for transaction.
 		 * This will come into picture when after shifting extent into
@@ -1529,7 +1528,7 @@ xfs_collapse_file_space(
 		error = xfs_trans_reserve(tp, &M_RES(mp)->tr_write,
 				XFS_DIOSTRAT_SPACE_RES(mp, 0), 0);
 		if (error) {
-			ASSERT(error == ENOSPC || XFS_FORCED_SHUTDOWN(mp));
+			ASSERT(XFS_FORCED_SHUTDOWN(mp));
 			xfs_trans_cancel(tp, 0);
 			break;
 		}
-- 
1.7.11-rc0

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs




[Index of Archives]     [Linux XFS Devel]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux