Re: [PATCH 5/5] xfs: remove shared supberlock feature checking

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, May 06, 2014 at 03:48:43PM +0800, Jeff Liu wrote:
> 
> On 05/06 2014 11:55 AM, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > From: Dave Chinner <dchinner@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > 
> > We reject any filesystem that is mounted with this feature bit set,
> > so we don't need to check for it anywhere else. Remove the function
> > for checking if the feature bit is set and any code that uses it.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  fs/xfs/xfs_fsops.c |  2 --
> >  fs/xfs/xfs_sb.c    |  3 ++-
> >  fs/xfs/xfs_sb.h    | 17 ++++-------------
> >  3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_fsops.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_fsops.c
> > index b099799..97886a7 100644
> > --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_fsops.c
> > +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_fsops.c
> > @@ -84,8 +84,6 @@ xfs_fs_geometry(
> >  				XFS_FSOP_GEOM_FLAGS_IALIGN : 0) |
> >  			(xfs_sb_version_hasdalign(&mp->m_sb) ?
> >  				XFS_FSOP_GEOM_FLAGS_DALIGN : 0) |
> > -			(xfs_sb_version_hasshared(&mp->m_sb) ?
> > -				XFS_FSOP_GEOM_FLAGS_SHARED : 0) |
> 
> Just a trivial comments, now the XFS_FSOP_GEOM_FLAGS_SHARED is useless, so
> we can remove it from fs/xfs/xfs.h.

That's a public API header file, so removing it could break
applications. It's OK to leave it there, I think.

> Otherwise, looks good to me.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Jie Liu <jeff.liu@xxxxxxxxxx>

Thanks!

Cheers,

Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs




[Index of Archives]     [Linux XFS Devel]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux