On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 08:04:29AM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote: > From: Dave Chinner <dchinner@xxxxxxxxxx> > > On small block size filesystems, the reserve pool size is kept > constant at 4MB. filesystems with smaller blocks use comparitively > more blocks for indexing metadata (e.g. in the inode and extent > btrees) and so having a higher indirect block usage. Hence we need > to leave the reserve pool at 1024 block and not scale it for a > constant size. > > This makes the test pass on a filesystem made with MKFS_OPTIONS="-b > size=1024 -m crc=1". Looks good, Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx> _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
