On 04/21 2014 21:09 PM, Brian Foster wrote: > On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 08:46:39PM +0800, Jeff Liu wrote: >> Hi Tuomas, >> >> On 04/21 2014 18:04 PM, Tuomas Tynkkynen wrote: >>> xfs_{compat_,}attrmulti_by_handle could return an errno with incorrect >>> sign in some cases. While at it, make sure ENOMEM is returned instead of >>> E2BIG if kmalloc fails. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Tuomas Tynkkynen <tuomas.tynkkynen@xxxxxx> >>> --- >>> Compile tested only. For the ERANGE case, I also wonder if it should >>> be assigning to ops[i].am_error instead of error, and/or have a break. >> >> If I understand right, ops[i].am_error is used to save the internal operation result, >> i.e, xfs_attrmult_attr_get{set}... but error is used for the ioctl call results. >> Therefore, assign ERANGE to error is compatible with the VFS set{get}xattr syscalls in >> case of "if (ops[i].am_error == 0 || ops[i].am_error == MAXNAMELEN)". >> > > But we set 'error' in this case and effectively try to continue the operation > whereas the traditional vfs path returns... So the error would always be set to ERANGE if one or more attrname is/are invalid. > >> It seems that we don't need to have a break in this case because xfs_attrmulti_by_handle() >> is used to process multiple attrs. Hence if a given attrname in ops array is invalid, >> the am_error will indicate that with ENOATTR or EFAULT...but it should proceed to loop >> through the left array members. >> > > Perhaps so if am_error == 0, but it depends on what attr_name contains > at that point (stale data?). Otherwise, we try to proceed with a > truncated name. It looks like the consistent thing to do would be set > am_error to ERANGE and continue (i.e., skip the op and move on to the > next). If we continue to process a truncated name in case of MAXNAMELEN, it would return EFAULT for SET/REMOVE operations, and ENOATTR for GET operation, which would be set back to am_error, but error still keep as ERANGE which is consistently. Thanks, -Jeff _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs