Re: [PATCH 2/2] xfs: Nuke XFS_ERROR macro

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 10:39:56AM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 07:44:44PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > On Thu, 17 Apr 2014 08:08:08 +1000
> > Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > Steve, we want to be able to trap specific return codes from
> > > functions. Say, for example, the first function that returns
> > > EINVAL/-EINVAL in XFS under a given workload.
> > > 
> > > What's the most efficient way to do that with ftrace?
> > > 
> > > And can that be set up as a trigger so we can use it to dump a
> > > snapshot of the last N events into the trace buffer or do other
> > > interesting things with that event?
> > 
> > Well, after you do the above, you could also do a while loop to all
> > those events and update the filter:
> > 
> > echo 'arg1 > 0xffffffffffffff00' > /debug/tracing/events/kprobes/filter
> > 
> > Which would trace only those functions that had an error code (assuming
> > the error code is less than 256). You could also use the trigger files:
> > 
> > echo 'traceoff if arg1 > 0xffffffffffffff00' > /debug/tracing/events/kprobes/*/trigger
> > 
> > The above wont actually work as is, you would need to do another while
> > loop of trigger files and set them each individually.
> 
> so, basically a script that does:
> 
> #!/bin/bash
> 
> TRACEDIR=/sys/kernel/debug/tracing
> 
> grep -i 't xfs_' /proc/kallsyms | awk '{print $3}' ; while read F; do
> 	echo "r:ret_$F $F \$retval" >> $TRACEDIR/kprobe_events
> done
> 
> for E in $TRACEDIR/events/kprobes/ret_xfs_*/enable; do
> 	echo 1 > $E
> done;
> 
> echo 'arg1 > 0xffffffffffffff00' > $TRACEDIR/events/kprobes/filter
> 
> for T in $TRACEDIR/events/kprobes/ret_xfs_*/trigger; do
> 	echo 'traceoff if arg1 > 0xffffffffffffff00' > $T
> done
> 
> And that gives:
> 
> # dd if=/dev/zero of=/mnt/scratch/newfile bs=513 oflag=direct
> dd: error writing ¿/mnt/scratch/newfile¿: Invalid argument
> 1+0 records in
> 0+0 records out
> 0 bytes (0 B) copied, 0.000259882 s, 0.0 kB/s
> root@test4:~# cat /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/trace
> # tracer: nop
> #
> # entries-in-buffer/entries-written: 1/1   #P:16
> #
> #                              _-----=> irqs-off
> #                             / _----=> need-resched
> #                            | / _---=> hardirq/softirq
> #                            || / _--=> preempt-depth
> #                            ||| /     delay
> #           TASK-PID   CPU#  ||||    TIMESTAMP  FUNCTION
> #              | |       |   ||||       |         |
>            <...>-8073  [006] d... 145740.460546: ret_xfs_file_dio_aio_write: (xfs_file_aio_write+0x170/0x180 <- xfs_file_dio_aio_write) arg1=0xffffffffffffffea
> 
> Which is precisely the detection that XFS_ERROR would have given us.
> Ok, so I guess we can now add whatever need need to that trigger...
> 
> Basically, pass in teh XFs function names you want to trace, the
> sets up teh events, whatever trigger beahviour you want, and
> we're off to the races...

FWIW, this strikes me as something that would be useful for
trace-cmd to be able to control, creating the kprobes dynamically
based on the function name specification given on the command
line similar to how we specify the events we want it to trace..

I'm sure there's more people that just us that want to know what
function a specific error first comes from and how it propagates
back up through the code....

Cheers,

Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs





[Index of Archives]     [Linux XFS Devel]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux