On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 12:18:26PM -0400, Brian Foster wrote: > xfs_create_tmpfile() duplicates most of xfs_create() with the exception > of a couple minor differences. We use a unique transaction reservation > and place the allocated inode on the unlinked list rather than create a > directory entry for it. > > Fold xfs_create_tmpfile() into xfs_create() to reduce some of this > duplication. The name parameter that represents the name of the > directory entry to create is now conditional and its existence dictates > whether a directory entry is created for the inode or not. > > Signed-off-by: Brian Foster <bfoster@xxxxxxxxxx> Looks correct although I still can't get excited about it.. Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx> _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
