On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 02:46:15PM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote: > From: Dave Chinner <dchinner@xxxxxxxxxx> > > We negate the error value being returned from a generic function > incorrectly. The code path that it is running in returned negative > errors, so there is no need to negate it to get the correct error > signs here. > > This was uncovered by generic/019. Looks good, Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx> _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs