[PATCH 12/14 V2] xfs_repair: address never-true tests in repair/bmap.c on 64 bit

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



The test "if (new_naexts > BLKMAP_NEXTS_MAX)" is never true
on a 64-bit platform; new_naexts is an int, and BLKMAP_NEXTS_MAX
is INT_MAX.  So just wrap the whole thing in the #ifdef.

Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxx>
---

V2: Fix typo in comment in first hunk

 repair/bmap.c |    8 ++++----
 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/repair/bmap.c b/repair/bmap.c
index 85d66dc..b81efb9 100644
--- a/repair/bmap.c
+++ b/repair/bmap.c
@@ -47,16 +47,16 @@ blkmap_alloc(
 	if (nex < 1)
 		nex = 1;
 
+#if (BITS_PER_LONG == 32)	/* on 64-bit platforms this is never true */
 	if (nex > BLKMAP_NEXTS_MAX) {
-#if (BITS_PER_LONG == 32)
 		do_warn(
 	_("Number of extents requested in blkmap_alloc (%d) overflows 32 bits.\n"
 	  "If this is not a corruption, then you will need a 64 bit system\n"
 	  "to repair this filesystem.\n"),
 			nex);
-#endif
 		return NULL;
 	}
+#endif
 
 	key = whichfork ? ablkmap_key : dblkmap_key;
 	blkmap = pthread_getspecific(key);
@@ -267,15 +267,15 @@ blkmap_grow(
 		ASSERT(pthread_getspecific(key) == blkmap);
 	}
 
+#if (BITS_PER_LONG == 32)	/* on 64-bit platforms this is never true */
 	if (new_naexts > BLKMAP_NEXTS_MAX) {
-#if (BITS_PER_LONG == 32)
 		do_error(
 	_("Number of extents requested in blkmap_grow (%d) overflows 32 bits.\n"
 	  "You need a 64 bit system to repair this filesystem.\n"),
 			new_naexts);
-#endif
 		return NULL;
 	}
+#endif
 	if (new_naexts <= 0) {
 		do_error(
 	_("Number of extents requested in blkmap_grow (%d) overflowed the\n"


_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs




[Index of Archives]     [Linux XFS Devel]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux