On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 10:39:31AM -0700, Eric Sandeen wrote: > so only _xfs_buf_ioend *might* pass something other than 0, and: > > File Function Line > 0 xfs_buf.c xfs_buf_bio_end_io 1197 _xfs_buf_ioend(bp, 1); > 1 xfs_buf.c xfs_buf_iorequest 1377 _xfs_buf_ioend(bp, bp->b_error ? 0 : 1); > > At least up until now that was always called with "1" Right, _was_. But that changes to one always passing 1, and one passing 0 or one with your patch. Or one passing always 1 and one always passing 0 with the suggestion from Brian and me. Either way we'd still have versions passing 1. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
