On 02/17, Al Viro wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 05:57:35PM +0100, Oleg Nesterov wrote: > > > Looks like, this is all is really nasty. Actually, I think siginfo on > > stack is not that bad if we are going to do handle_signal() or restart, > > perhaps we can do the extra kmalloc/memcpy/kfree for do_coredump(). > > Something like below. > > Yecchhhh... You've just broken every architecture other than x86, Of course, this is only to explain what I meant. > and to > fix them you'll need to massage every get_signal()/get_signal_to_deliver() > user out there, Yes. > pulling the logics *out* of kernel/signal.c and into arch/*. Not really, I think. Of course this change should be cleanuped. And it should not require to change all architectures at once. > This is just plain wrong. I agree, this change is also ugly. Oleg. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
