On 02/12, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 1:14 PM, Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > Umm... What if we delay __sigqueue_free()? After all, that's where the > > fat sucker normally comes from. That way we might get away with much > > smaller structure on stack... > > Sounds like the RightThing(tm) to do to me, and I don't see why it > wouldn't work. Probably... I'll try to reply tomorrow. > We'd have to teach each user of "dequeue_signal()" to free the siginfo > thing. And we should be careful with SIGQUEUE_PREALLOC, at least collect_signal() should not do list_del_init()... Plus we need to handle the SEND_SIG_FORCED-like case. Oleg. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
