Hi Josef,
On 02/11/2014 03:18 AM, Josef Bacik wrote:
On 02/10/2014 07:10 AM, Wang Shilong wrote:
From: Wang Shilong <wangsl.fnst@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
So i was wandering why test 004 could pass my previous wrong
kernel patch while it defenitely should not.
By some debugging, i found here perl script is wrong, we did not
filter out anything and this unit test did not work acutally.so
it came out we will never fail this test.
So now with this patch I'm failing it, is there some btrfs patch I
need to make it not fail or is it still not supposed to fail normally
and is this patch broken? Thanks,
You should not have updated my previous patch(Btrfs: switch to
btrfs_previous_extent_item()) when you fail this test.
I update your latest btrfs-next which has updated my previous patch and
it can pass this case, did you miss that?
Thanks,
Wang
Josef
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
