Re: [PATCH] xfs_db: fix the setting of unaligned directory fields

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Feb 08, 2014 at 11:30:50AM -0600, Mark Tinguely wrote:
> On 02/08/14 02:30, Dave Chinner wrote:
> >On Fri, Feb 07, 2014 at 05:13:21PM -0600, Mark Tinguely wrote:
> >>On 02/07/14 16:33, Dave Chinner wrote:
> >>>On Fri, Feb 07, 2014 at 04:03:42PM -0600, Mark Tinguely wrote:
> >>>>@@ -526,16 +527,20 @@ convert_arg(
> >>>>  		 */
> >>>>  		*value = strtoll(arg, NULL, 0);
> >>>
> >>>If we are touching this code, the return value here should be error
> >>>checked.
> >>>
> >>>xfs_db>   write u3.bmx[0].startblock 3rgfdw
> >>>u3.bmx[0].startblock = 52776558133248
> >>
> >>hmm, It should stop at 3. I will take a look.
> >
> >Even if it stops at 3, that's still wrong because it's failed to
> >process the entire user input....
> >
> >>>xfs_db>   write u3.bmx[0].startblock x3rgfdw
> >>>u3.bmx[0].startblock = 0
> >>>xfs_db>
> >>>
> >>>i.e. it accepts garbage rather than erroring out.
> >>
> >>as does all the other writes ...
> >>xfs_db>   write core.nblocks x3rgfdw
> >>core.nblocks = 0
> >>
> >>Fixing convert_arg() is beyond the scope of just this patch.
> >
> >Sure, but I'm not asking you to fix all of convert_args in this
> >patch, just asking you to do a complete job of fixing the bitval
> >input processing in this patch.
> >
> >But, seeing as you've raised that convert_args() has other broken
> >paths, can you also write new patches to address those issues? It
> >won't take you long while all this code is fresh in your mind, and
> >if you do it now it won't get dropped on the floor until somebody
> >else hits it a couple of years down the track...
> >
> 
> It needs to be split up. write_string() needs string inputs,
> write_struct() need numeric inputs.

write_struct() handles every type of possible input -
string varables, integers, UUIDs, etc. i.e. something like

xfs_db> write sb.uuid <xxxx-yyyy-....>

runs through write_struct(), it finds the uuid field definition in
the superblock description and then calls convert_args() on it to
convert the uuid format input.

IOWs, convert_args() needs to handle all the types of input. Hence
you might like to factor convert_args, but it still needs to handle
arbitrary input types.

>  Who uses the UUID-style hex
> blocks? It feels like a black hole of time.

Obvious answer: UUIDs

$ git grep FLDT_UUID
db/agf.c:       { "uuid", FLDT_UUID, OI(OFF(uuid)), C1, 0, TYP_NONE },
db/agfl.c:      { "uuid", FLDT_UUID, OI(OFF(uuid)), C1, 0, TYP_NONE },
db/agi.c:       { "uuid", FLDT_UUID, OI(OFF(uuid)), C1, 0, TYP_NONE },
db/btblock.c:   { "uuid", FLDT_UUID, OI(OFF(u.l.bb_uuid)), C1, 0, TYP_NONE },
db/btblock.c:   { "uuid", FLDT_UUID, OI(OFF(u.l.bb_uuid)), C1, 0, TYP_NONE },
db/btblock.c:   { "uuid", FLDT_UUID, OI(OFF(u.s.bb_uuid)), C1, 0, TYP_NONE },
db/btblock.c:   { "uuid", FLDT_UUID, OI(OFF(u.s.bb_uuid)), C1, 0, TYP_NONE },
db/btblock.c:   { "uuid", FLDT_UUID, OI(OFF(u.s.bb_uuid)), C1, 0, TYP_NONE },
db/dir2.c:      { "uuid", FLDT_UUID, OI(DBH3OFF(uuid)), C1, 0, TYP_NONE },
db/dir2.c:      { "uuid", FLDT_UUID, OI(DB3OFF(uuid)), C1, 0, TYP_NONE },
db/dquot.c:     { "uuid", FLDT_UUID, OI(DDOFF(uuid)), C1, 0, TYP_NONE },
db/field.c:     { FLDT_UUID, "uuid", fp_uuid, NULL, SI(bitsz(uuid_t)), 0, NULL, N
db/field.h:     FLDT_UUID,
db/inode.c:     { "uuid", FLDT_UUID, OI(COFF(uuid)), C1, 0, TYP_NONE },
db/inode.c:     { "muuid", FLDT_UUID, NULL, inode_u_muuid_count, FLD_COUNT, TYP_N
db/sb.c:        { "uuid", FLDT_UUID, OI(OFF(uuid)), C1, 0, TYP_NONE },
db/symlink.c:   { "uuid", FLDT_UUID, OI(OFF(uuid)), C1, 0, TYP_NONE },
$

Slightly less obvious answer is writing arbitrary binary data to
block regions in structures, such as writing multiple entries in an
array in a single command (e.g. FLD_ARRAY structure sections). I've
used this to move sections of directory blocks around in the past....

> It goes on my 'off the clock' to do list.

Ok, I'll just assume that means it'll never get done so I'll get a
pleasent surprise when you send the patch tomorrow....

Cheers,

Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs




[Index of Archives]     [Linux XFS Devel]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux