Re: [PATCH] xfs/296: fix golden output

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2/4/14, 7:53 PM, Dave Chinner wrote:
> From: Dave Chinner <dchinner@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> This test never passed, so the golden output was never properly
> verified as correct. Now that the bug is fixed, fix the golden
> output to match the actual test output.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  tests/xfs/296.out | 3 ++-
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tests/xfs/296.out b/tests/xfs/296.out
> index 1fb1b69..c279465 100644
> --- a/tests/xfs/296.out
> +++ b/tests/xfs/296.out
> @@ -50,6 +50,7 @@ Checking for xattr on restored file
>  user.name
>  
>  Checking for capability on restored file
> -RESTORE_DIR/DUMP_SUBDIR/testfile cap_setgid,cap_setuid+ep
> +RESTORE_DIR/DUMP_SUBDIR/testfile = cap_setgid,cap_setuid+ep
>  # file: RESTORE_DIR/DUMP_SUBDIR/testfile
>  security.capability
> +
> 

Hm, thanks.  I guess I just made it up the first time.  ;)

Reviewed-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxx>

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs




[Index of Archives]     [Linux XFS Devel]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux