On 01/29 2014 12:28 AM, Eric Sandeen wrote: > xfs_mount_validate_sb doesn't check sb_inopblock for sanity > (as does its xfs_repair counterpart, FWIW). > > If it's out of bounds, we can go off the rails in i.e. > xfs_inode_buf_verify(), which uses sb_inopblock as a loop > limit when stepping through a metadata buffer. > > The problem can be demonstrated easily by corrupting > sb_inopblock with xfs_db and trying to mount the result: > > # mkfs.xfs -dfile,name=fsfile,size=1g > # xfs_db -x fsfile > xfs_db> sb 0 > xfs_db> write inopblock 512 > inopblock = 512 > xfs_db> quit > > # mount -o loop fsfile mnt > and we blow up in xfs_inode_buf_verify(). > > With this patch, we get a (very noisy) corruption error, > and fail the mount as we should. > > Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > > diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_sb.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_sb.c > index b7c9aea..511cce9 100644 > --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_sb.c > +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_sb.c > @@ -288,6 +288,7 @@ xfs_mount_validate_sb( > sbp->sb_inodelog < XFS_DINODE_MIN_LOG || > sbp->sb_inodelog > XFS_DINODE_MAX_LOG || > sbp->sb_inodesize != (1 << sbp->sb_inodelog) || > + sbp->sb_inopblock != howmany(sbp->sb_blocksize,sbp->sb_inodesize) || > (sbp->sb_blocklog - sbp->sb_inodelog != sbp->sb_inopblog) || > (sbp->sb_rextsize * sbp->sb_blocksize > XFS_MAX_RTEXTSIZE) || > (sbp->sb_rextsize * sbp->sb_blocksize < XFS_MIN_RTEXTSIZE) || Looks good to me. Reviewed-by: Jie Liu <jeff.liu@xxxxxxxxxx> Thanks, -Jeff _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs