On 01/21 2014 19:10 PM, Dave Chinner wrote: > From: Dave Chinner <dchinner@xxxxxxxxxx> > > This test relies of the contents of the sb_features2 field being > known. Make sure ot clear allt eh MKFS_OPTIONS and ensure that we > direct mkfs to create only the simplest of featuresets to test this > functionality. > > Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > tests/xfs/199 | 5 ++++- > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/tests/xfs/199 b/tests/xfs/199 > index 1d64e02..c1b5962 100755 > --- a/tests/xfs/199 > +++ b/tests/xfs/199 > @@ -49,7 +49,10 @@ _supported_os Linux > > _require_scratch > > -_scratch_mkfs_xfs -l lazy-count=1 >/dev/null 2>&1 > +# clear any mkfs options so taht we can directly specify the options we need to ^^^ a typo... > +# be able to test the features bitmask behaviour correctly. > +MKFS_OPTIONS= > +_scratch_mkfs_xfs -l lazy-count=1 -i projid32bit=0 >/dev/null 2>&1 > > # > # Print the current flags. Just a dummy so that the test breaks Looks good to me. Reviewed-by: Jie Liu <jeff.liu@xxxxxxxxxx> Thanks, -Jeff _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
