On Tue, Jan 07, 2014 at 09:20:12PM +0000, Chris Mason wrote: > On Tue, 2014-01-07 at 16:17 -0500, Josef Bacik wrote: > > On 01/07/2014 03:40 PM, Ben Myers wrote: > > > On Tue, Jan 07, 2014 at 02:10:15PM -0600, Eric Sandeen wrote: > > >> On 1/7/14, 2:01 PM, Ben Myers wrote: > > >>> Hey Gents, > > >>> > > >>> On Mon, Jan 06, 2014 at 03:46:58PM -0600, Eric Sandeen wrote: > > >>>> On 1/6/14, 3:42 PM, Josef Bacik wrote: > > >>>>> On 01/06/2014 04:32 PM, Eric Sandeen wrote: > > >>>>>> On 1/6/14, 1:58 PM, Josef Bacik wrote: > > >>>>>>> I was trying to reproduce something with fsx and I noticed that no matter what > > >>>>>>> seed I set I was getting the same file. Come to find out we are overloading > > >>>>>>> random() with our own custom horribleness for some unknown reason. So nuke the > > >>>>>>> damn thing from orbit and rely on glibc's random(). With this fix the -S option > > >>>>>>> actually does something with fsx. Thanks, .... > For now we can just use srandom? Seems to me like it will solve the problem. Josef? Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
