On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 12:14:34PM -0600, Ben Myers wrote: > > What's really needed there to make XFS behave more similar to everyone > > else is a way for the filesystem to say: "I can't actually free this > > inode right now, but I'll come back to you later". > > This test might read something like: "If my link count has gone to zero, and I > am the last inode in my cluster to be freed, and there are other inodes from my > cluster incore, I cannot be freed." It's more complicated than that. In theory we would free the inode easily as soon as the VFS wants it, but performance would be horrible as we would have to synchronously write back the inode. Note that it really matters for the interface, that just needs to be an: I won't free this right now, but I'll call you back later when I can. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
