On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 01:33:14PM -0600, Ben Myers wrote: > Hey Rich, > > On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 11:29:04AM -0600, Rich Johnston wrote: > > On 12/17/2013 09:31 AM, Rich Johnston wrote: > > >I was planning on a xfsdump and xfstests release this week before I go > > >on vacation. Any objections? > > Currently xfstests is not released, should this be changed? > > > > I will wait until I return on Jan 2 to release xfsprogs. > > > > > > > >Release versions for xfsprogs are still being discussed. Are there any > > >more comments on this subject? > > Here is one of the threads discussing this. > > > > http://oss.sgi.com/archives/xfs/2013-10/msg00421.html > > Christoph were you saying you create xfsprogs branches? > > > > Is there a consensus on version names/branches for xfsprogs? > > I suggest a branch directly off of 3.1.11 release, and then we can troll the > log between refs/tags/3.1.11 and master for bugfixes. > > e.g. git checkout -b for-3.1.12 refs/tags/3.1.11 > > And then push it up to oss. Agreed - we're not really ready for a 3.2.0 release yet. I also think that we'll need a couple of weeks to test any 3.1.12 branch that is made before it can be released, too. Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
