On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 02:27:47PM -0600, Ben Myers wrote: > On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 08:31:31AM -0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > Looks good, > > > > Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx> > > Also discussed here: > http://oss.sgi.com/archives/xfs/2013-07/msg00024.html > > Before pulling this in we should probably let Dave give another 2c. Well, I stand by what I wrote in that thread. There is absolutely nothing wrong with having xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx listed as a maintainer; different and unusual doesn't mean it is wrong. Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
