On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 10:38:59PM -0500, J. Bruce Fields wrote: > In the v3 case I'd expect the open O_TRUNC to result in a SETATTR rpc, > in the v4 case an OPEN rpc. Both result in a call to nfsd_setattr, > though I only see nfsd_setattr turning off the SUID/SGID bits in the > chown case. Are you sure it isn't the subsequent write that clears > those bits? We've traditionally cleared the suid bits for O_TRUNC for local filesystem, although this is more a convention than a real security need. It would still be good if NFSv4 would follow the general semantics. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
